UFE Report is out… Finally!

May 15th, 2007 · 7 Comments

The UFE Report for the 2006 test is finally available on the ICAO website. It’s been many months, since November 24th when the results came out, but it’s here!

I would link to it or provide it for download, but it’s behind the paywall that only members can access so I have a feeling I may run afoul of the Institute by offering it — and I know that people at various Insti­tutes read my blog!

The UFE Report is fun to read because in it the Board of Evalu­ators talk about how disap­pointed they were while reading candi­dates’ responses. I mean they really lay into us. It’s great enter­tainment. Some gems:

  • In some cases candi­dates discussed treatment options at some length even though they were evidently not suitable in the circum­stances or were clearly not allowed by the profession’s standards… [which] would be a waste of a client’s time in real life.”
  • Many candi­dates failed to demon­strate their under­standing of the various types of risk (audit risk, inherent risk, control risk and detection risk). They would often state ‘risk is high’ without speci­fying which risk was high.”
  • The board was shocked and disap­pointed by the number of candi­dates who did not attempt even a single calcu­lation on this simulation, consid­ering that they were specif­i­cally asked to calculate the prelim­inary adjustments.”

Shocked and disap­pointed in that last one! I can’t remember whether I tried a calcu­lation on that case, but I do remember the case and feeling like if I failed, it was because of that case. So maybe I did try a calculation.

After the listing of the griev­ances the Report goes through each case in detail, providing a marking key for future writers to study from.

However, I’m realizing now just how useless it is for me since I don’t have my test. It was encrypted and saved on a USB key each of the three days and we don’t get it back. I can’t remember the details of my responses, since it’s been since mid-September.

Oh well. It’s done, I passed, I’ll be a CA soon!

Category: Profession
Tags: , , ,

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Edmund Murphy // May 16, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    Well, I’m writing the UFE this year (if I get by the SOA first), so I’ll certainly be downloading and reading this report. I sure I hope I don’t shock or disap­point anyone this Sept.

    But seriously, it is nice to be able to access previous exams along with the marking guide and marker’s comments. It reduces the stress level if you have some idea of what you are facing and what the markers are expecting of you when you go into an exam.

  • 2 Neil // May 17, 2007 at 5:42 pm

    Oh for sure! Last summer, other than Densmore cases, I wrote and studied every case from the 2003, 2004 and 2005 exams.

  • 3 Krupo // Jun 7, 2007 at 12:51 pm

    It’s funny, I was digging through your old posts to see what important news I missed on vacation. One of my UFE mentees in particular just mentioned to me today that the report is out, so I went here to doublecheck before digging through the ICAO site. Damnit, wish you had a link handy. :)

    Ah… (found it) click on UFE Reports here… http://www.icao.on.ca/CAstudents/UniformEvaluation(UFE)/page1147.aspx

    Now to dig out my ID:)

  • 4 Krupo // Jun 7, 2007 at 12:53 pm

    Oh they did NOT just break the link I gener­ously shared above by using brackets, did they? Geez. Remember to copy and paste!

    I’ll be sure to include some commentary on that soon, I have a stable (manger?) of four writers to shepherd this year.

  • 5 Some interesting accounting reading: the 2006 UFE report - A Counting School // Jun 7, 2007 at 1:11 pm

    […] one or two brilliant insights away from becoming Canada’s Gold Medalist for the year.Anyway, Neil didn’t post a direct link to the report, but I will — just go to the ICAO’s website if […]

  • 6 Neil // Jun 8, 2007 at 11:06 am

    LOL, manger of writers.

    You know you can include HTML links in these comments right?

    UFE Report 2006

  • 7 Krupo // Jun 10, 2007 at 5:26 pm

    I just wrote my own post instead… I’ll remember that though. :)

Leave a Comment