<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professional 2.0:  beacon or buzzword?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/</link>
	<description>From external to internal audit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:28:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Yeah if they can pass the UFE with no audit experience &#8212; well that&#039;s impressive to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah if they can pass the UFE with no audit experience — well that’s impressive to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krupo</title>
		<link>http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>Krupo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neilmcintyre.ca/professional-20-beacon-or-buzzword/#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Hmm, any correlation between that CPA issue and the CICA&#039;s moves to allow CA&#039;s to gain experience in industry-only, with the caveat that they can&#039;t get audit licenses until getting audit experience? I wonder.

I also wonder what the effect will be on these &quot;alternatively qualified CAs?&quot;

I&#039;m already beginning to think of it as &quot;CA*lite&quot;, no doubt to the chagrin of the Institute.

On the upside, the CA*lite&#039;s will still have to pass the UFE which - if they&#039;re doing it successfully with no audit experience - will mean that they studied in a kick-ass manner, if nothing else, since that exam is HARD if you haven&#039;t actually applied the theory that you&#039;re writing about.

Perhaps my joking &quot;CA*lite&quot; reference will die right here, having given it the thought from the previous paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, any correlation between that CPA issue and the CICA’s moves to allow CA’s to gain experience in industry-only, with the caveat that they can’t get audit licenses until getting audit experience? I wonder.</p>
<p>I also wonder what the effect will be on these “alternatively qualified CAs?”</p>
<p>I’m already beginning to think of it as “CA*lite”, no doubt to the chagrin of the Institute.</p>
<p>On the upside, the CA*lite’s will still have to pass the UFE which — if they’re doing it successfully with no audit experience — will mean that they studied in a kick-ass manner, if nothing else, since that exam is HARD if you haven’t actually applied the theory that you’re writing about.</p>
<p>Perhaps my joking “CA*lite” reference will die right here, having given it the thought from the previous paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

