Incorporate or not: It’s the investment

September 28th, 2006 · 2 Comments

A small business usually starts out as a sole propri­etorship, owned and operated by the founder personally and reporting business income on their annual personal tax return.

But as the business grows, the question of incor­po­ration will always arise, and there are several factors to consider when this happens.

The most important single factor, in my opinion, is the tax savings that can be achieved through the corporate structure. Income earned in the corpo­ration is taxed at a relatively low rate (20%ish) for small businesses (in Canada at least) and is then taxed when it is paid to share­holders as dividends.

Unincor­po­rated business income is taxed at the earner’s highest marginal rate, which, in Canada, is 46%(ish).

The conclusion is that income that will be reinvested in the business (and thus, not paid out as dividends) will be taxed at a lower rate and allow the business to grow much faster than if it remained unincorporated.

If losses are expected, the owner is better off unincor­po­rated, because those losses will flow through to his/her personal return and can be used to offset other sources of income. Losses in a corpo­ration can only be used against income earned in that corporation.

Other advan­tages:

  • Separating business and personal income
  • Controlling the timing of business (dividend) income
  • Limited liability of the corporation

Category: Taxation
Tags: , , , , , ,

2 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Krupo // Sep 28, 2006 at 9:17 pm

    Handy little UFE summary for the 2007 writers you have there.

    Or for reality, I suppose. :)

  • 2 Neil // Sep 29, 2006 at 12:06 am

    I started that post while studying for the UFE but never got around to tying it up and publishing!

Leave a Comment