Big Four dominate professional services globally

July 12th, 2007 · 6 Comments

The Managing Partners’ Forum was estab­lished in 1995 and is “dedicated to enhancing leadership and the status of the management team in profes­sional firms worldwide.” They recently released the inaugural Global 500, a ranking of the top 500 profes­sional services firms in the world by fee volume.

The Big Four are at the top of the list, with Price­wa­ter­house­C­oopers coming first, followed by Deloitte, Ernst & Young, and KPMG. Inter­est­ingly, Accenture, formerly Andersen Consulting, formerly a division of Arthur Andersen, formerly the auditor of Enron, formerly in existence, occupies the number five spot:

  1. PwC — $22.0B
  2. Deloitte — $20.0B
  3. Ernst & Young — $18.4B
  4. KPMG — $16.9B
  5. Accenture — $16.7B

I threw the numbers into Excel to do a little analysis. First, I wanted to see how they stacked up in terms of revenue per employee, since the report provided the number of employees. The third ranked firm in total revenue, Ernst & Young, is #1 when it comes to revenue per employee at approx­i­mately $161,000. The average of the Big Four is $154,000. The remainder of the four are in the same order as revenues, with PwC and Deloitte shuffling down to make way for E&Y:

  1. Ernst & Young — $161,000
  2. PwC — $154,000
  3. Deloitte — $151,000
  4. KPMG — $150,000

Beyond the Big Four, the next largest accounting firm is BDO at 22nd overall. Rounding out the top 10 accounting firms are Grant Thornton (35th), RSM (36th), Baker Tilly (46th), Horwath (48th) and Moores Rowland (50th). The average revenue per employee for those five firms is $114,230, which is signif­i­cantly lower than BDO, in the middle of everyone, at $140,500.

The bottom of the Big Four in terms of total revenue is KPMG, but it is 332 per cent higher than BDO. There is about 10 per cent separating each of the Big Four, with PwC 10% larger than Deloitte, which is 9% larger than Ernst & Young, which is 9% larger than KPMG. BDO is about 40% larger than Grant Thornton and RSM. So the Big Four more spread out between each other than I’d origi­nally thought, but is leagues above the rest of the pack which comes as no surprise at all.

It’s an inter­esting list, by an inter­esting ‘Forum’. Management in profes­sional firms is a different beast altogether from management of more tradi­tional “opera­tions”. Experi­enced employees are an intan­gible asset of any type of business, but in profes­sional services firms there are unique challenges which require special people skills. A good managing partner is so important to retaining strong team members and keeping them (us) satisfied.

(Via Accoun­tancy Matters.)

Category: Profession
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

6 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Krupo // Jul 12, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    Inter­esting chart. So often you find students wondering, “which firm is biggest”, and many people who work in them don’t know the answer.

  • 2 Neil // Jul 14, 2007 at 9:16 pm

    Yeah the chart was definitely new infor­mation for me. Can you use this to recruit students though? I mean, other than satis­fying curiosity, does one firm’s absolute size really tell you anything about whether it would be a good fit?

  • 3 Krupo // Jul 16, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    Nope, just curiosity satis­faction. ;)

  • 4 Rui // Jul 24, 2007 at 11:43 am

    Not a very accurate chart. Moores Rowland has alreday vanished and RSM “lost” its Uk and Ireland firm to GT. Anyway great news for auditors.

  • 5 Neil // Jul 24, 2007 at 10:50 pm

    Where did Moores Rowland go? To be honest I’d never heard of the firm before this list!

  • 6 Rui // Jul 25, 2007 at 10:32 am

    In some countries they merged with Mazars. In others they created the firm Praxity.

Leave a Comment