Apple brings in new director: Google’s CEO

September 4th, 2006 · 4 Comments

It has been announced recently that Dr. Eric Schmidt, currently the CEO of Google, is joining Apple’s Board of Directors. Boards are respon­sible for overseeing management, protecting share­holder interests and overall strategy.

The move has been hailed as a signal of future partnership between Google and Apple in their joint fights against Microsoft. I have to admit it basically looks that way to me too. I would even go so far as to say a Google-Apple alliance poses the biggest threat to Microsoft’s continued dominance on the desktop, ever.

I’ve always wondered why some Boards have an even number of members, what with the possi­bility of vote tying. They must have some other method of resolving those situa­tions when they inevitably crop up.

Steve Jobs is obviously an exception to most rules, but it’s rare to see someone in management on the Board in a public company, because of the inherent conflict of interest. I think Jobs is invested in Apple long-term though, so that’s no doubt why he gets away with it.

Category: Governance
Tags: , , , , , ,

4 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Krupo // Sep 4, 2006 at 5:08 pm

    Re: ties — due to absten­tions, even if you had an odd number, ties are possible. ;)

    Also, if a clear majority does not go in favour, then motions fail — so techni­cally a tie is a “loss” for whoever’s pushing a motion through.

  • 2 nm // Sep 5, 2006 at 2:22 am

    What do you think about the move itself?

  • 3 Krupo // Sep 5, 2006 at 11:21 pm

    Comment on the main topic actually discussed instead of the minor point? It’s like your pushing me to discuss the primary indicator instead of the secondary (2500 UFE writers laugh, 6 billion people shrug).

    I have nowhere near enough insight into deter­mining what Google-Apple are up to. ;)

    The symbolism is huge — the real effect, on the other hand, is questionable — I don’t see this making any huge changes anytime soon. Will we see more Google Gadgets that work on special Apple gear (iPods)? No idea… would it really have much of a deep effect? I don’t really see it. Or maybe I’m sleepy (take that, earlier fling with insomnia!). :)

  • 4 nm // Sep 6, 2006 at 7:09 pm

    Haha… Primary, secondary. Classic. ;)

Leave a Comment